K-2nd Grade - Gateway 3
Back to K-2nd Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Teacher and Student Supports
Gateway 3 - Meets Expectations | 100% |
|---|---|
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports | 10 / 10 |
Criterion 3.2: Student Supports | 6 / 6 |
Criterion 3.3: Intentional Design |
The materials reviewed for Bridges in Mathematics, Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for Teacher & Student Supports. The materials meet expectations for Criterion 1, Teacher Supports, Criterion 2, Student Supports and Criterion 3, Intentional Design.
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials include opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize with integrity to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The materials reviewed for Bridges in Mathematics, Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for Teacher Supports. The materials provide clear guidance through useful annotations and suggestions for enacting both student and ancillary materials. They include explanations and examples of grade-level concepts and standards, along with how these connect to prior and future grade levels, supporting teacher content knowledge. A year-long scope and sequence is provided, along with standards correlation information. The materials offer strategies for communicating with stakeholders and suggestions to support student progress. Additionally, they explain the program’s instructional approaches, identify research-based strategies, and clarify the role of the standards. A comprehensive list of required supplies is included, as well as multiple opportunities for assessing student learning, guidance for interpreting performance, and suggestions for follow-up instruction.
Indicator 3a
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in engaging students to guide their mathematical development.
The materials reviewed for Bridges in Mathematics Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for providing teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in order to guide their mathematical development.
Throughout the Teacher Guide, margin notes and sidebar annotations provide guidance on equity-based practices, effective mathematics teaching practices, and the Standards for Mathematical Practice. These notes highlight routines, call out strategies for supporting discourse-rich classrooms, and offer reminders to connect lessons to larger instructional goals. Each module and session includes an Overview with specific suggestions for engaging students in the mathematical content. For example:
In Grades K-2, Teacher Guide, Productive Practices states, “Throughout these materials, you will find sidebar notes designed to engage you in professional learning about equity-based practices, effective mathematics teaching practices, and the standards for mathematical practice. These three sets of practices address the development of capable doers, knowers, and sensemakers in different — yet inextricably linked — ways. When looked at together, these reflect our commitment to equitable and effective teaching practices and authentic learning experiences for students.” Math Teaching Practice states, “These activities are designed to address the three effective mathematics teaching practices critical to providing engaging and challenging mathematical experiences to students: establish mathematics goals to focus learning, implement tasks that promote reasoning and problem solving, and build procedural fluency from conceptual understanding. Math teaching practice sidebar notes call out explicit connections to these practices.” In Equity-Based Practice, the materials state,, “Critical to establishing a community of learners based on mutual respect are learning opportunities that invite mathematical exploration and that encourage collaboration enhanced by students’ strengths. Watch for sidebar notes that identify how particular activities go deep with mathematics or leverage multiple mathematical competencies.” Finally, in Instructional Routine, “Think-pair-share is one of the instructional routines featured throughout Bridges that focuses on classroom discourse. Throughout your Bridges materials, sidebars like this highlight instructional routines and their role in nurturing a discourse-rich classroom community and offering opportunities for mathematical sensemaking.”
In Grade 1, Unit 7, One Hundred & Beyond, Module 2 Overview, teachers receive detailed prompts, anticipated student responses, and strategies for reinforcing place value concepts while students construct a number path to 120. For example, the Overview explains that “the class recreates the nature path with cubes, marking each multiple of 10. They use decade numbers as landmarks to help locate, identify, and compare other numbers by magnitude.” Session 3 notes further support teachers by providing specific questions and sample student reasoning: “Ask students to solve the expression mentally… Casey: ‘I thought about 4 bundles and 2 sticks, then imagined taking away one of the bundles. That left 3 bundles and 2 sticks, which is 32.’ Dustin: ‘If it was four 10-trains and 2 loose cubes, you could take away one of the 10-trains. Then you’d have 32.’”
In Grade 2, Unit 6, Geometry, Module 1 Overview, teachers are supported through margin notes that anticipate common strategies and misconceptions as students explore measurement, data collection, and multi-digit computation. For example, when students play Target 700, teachers are guided to elicit different approaches: “Ask students to calculate how far each team’s score is from 700. Invite them to get out the base ten number pieces if these seem helpful… Teacher: ‘What should I write to represent the difference between 845 and 700?’ Student A: ‘You write 845 – 700, and I know the answer already.’ Teacher: ‘Great! Keep it under your hat for a moment.’”
Indicator 3b
Materials contain explanations and examples of grade-level/course-level concepts and/or standards and how the concepts and/or standards align to other grade/course levels so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Bridges in Mathematics Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for containing explanations and examples of grade-level concepts and/or standards and how the concepts and/or standards align to other grade levels so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The beginning of each unit, module, and session provides an overview of the concepts covered within the materials as well as background knowledge for the teacher. Examples include:
Kindergarten, Unit 4, Paths to Adding, Subtracting & Measuring, Unit 4 Overview, Mathematical Background, Counting & Cardinality states,“The work students do in kindergarten using number paths supports the work they’ll do with number lines throughout the elementary grades. In first grade, students use both a number path and a number line to work with numbers within 120. They add and subtract using a closed number line beginning with increments of 1 and later increments of 10, as they represent and solve addition and subtraction problems. This early introduction and repeated experiences over time afford students the time needed to develop interval counting, thereby laying the foundation for significant work with number lines in later grades. In grades 2 and 3, students use the open number line to represent different strategies and as a tool for adding and subtracting. The flexibility of the open number line invites them to add and subtract using friendly numbers, including multiples of 10 and 100. To solve 56+14, for example, students might decompose the 14 into 10 and 4. On the number line, they represent their thinking by showing jumps of 10 and 4 to get to 70.”
Grade 1, Unit 8, Changes, Changes, Unit 8 Overview, Mathematical Background, Data states, “Up until this point, work with telling time has been done primarily in Number Corner. The November and December Calendar Collector workouts and the March Calendar Grid workout focused on telling time to the hour and half hour. The activities in Unit 8, Module 1 provide final experiences with time and duration prior to grade 2, when students will learn to tell time to the nearest 5 minutes.”
Grade 2, Unit 4, Measurement, Unit 4 Overview, Mathematical Background, Measurement states, “In grade 3 and beyond, students extend their learning about length measurement to measuring to the nearest half, fourth, and eighth of an inch. They also engage in similar measurement experiences with different measurable attributes including area, volume, angle, weight, and mass. Throughout, students continue to encounter concepts related to unit size and equivalence as they work with conversions in both customary and metric measurement systems.”
Indicator 3c
Materials include a year-long scope and sequence with standards correlation information.
The materials reviewed for Bridges in Mathematics Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for including a year-long scope and sequence with standard correlation information.
The Bridges Educator Site includes a year-long scope and sequence document that details the entire school year, “A Scope & Sequence document lists the concepts, topics, and standards covered in each module of the Bridges Third Edition units and in each month of Number Corner Third Edition. (The scope refers to the content and skills within the curriculum, and the sequence refers to the order in which those topics are covered.)”
At each grade level, the Teacher Guide contains a section titled Developing Concepts & Skills Over Time, which explains how content is sequenced to build understanding, “Bridges in Mathematics recognizes that students need extended experiences with concepts over time to develop deep mathematical understandings. The continual development of content throughout Bridges units and Number Corner workouts follows a careful and intentional progression of instruction and is a hallmark of the program.”
Additional supports include:
Scope & Sequence charts, which show the broad content development across Bridges units and Number Corner months.
Curriculum Concept Maps, which “provide a broad view of how the major work of the unit is addressed and developed over the course of the year” and highlight connections across units and Number Corner workouts.
Skills & Concepts Across the Grade Levels charts, which “shows the skills and concepts addressed in each unit, indicates the level at which each is addressed in the unit, and shows where and how the skill is addressed elsewhere in current and adjacent grade levels.”
Indicator 3d
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
Indicator 3e
Materials explain the program’s instructional approaches, identify research-based strategies, and explain the role of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Bridges in Mathematics Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for explaining the program’s instructional approaches, identify research-based strategies, and explain the role of the standards. At each grade level, examples include:
The materials explain the program’s instructional approaches. The Teacher Guide describes Bridges in Mathematics Third Edition as “a comprehensive curriculum…that equips teachers to fully address national and state standards in a rigorous, engaging, and accessible manner.” The materials emphasize developing deep conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and problem-solving skills, with the goal of positioning students as “mathematical doers, knowers, and sensemakers.” In addition, the program highlights the importance of building a community of learners, noting that when “all classroom members respect one another, believe their ideas count, and are supported in exploring these ideas, instruction and learning are transformed.” Teachers are guided to model respect, create an environment that supports risk-taking, and use routines such as think-pair-share to promote active engagement, collaboration, and mathematical discourse.
The materials include and reference research-based strategies. The program draws directly on equity-based practices from Aguirre et al. (2013), which include going deep with mathematics and affirming learners’ identities, as well as on effective teaching practices outlined in Principles to Actions (NCTM, 2014) and Catalyzing Change in Early Childhood and Elementary Mathematics (NCTM, 2020). The Teacher Guide explains that Bridges “draws on research and leading mathematics education frameworks to support the development of high-quality curriculum,” grounding the instructional design in practices shown to support student understanding, achievement, and identity.
The materials include and reference the role of the standards. Bridges is designed to “fully address national and state standards” and consistently references the Standards for Mathematical Practice (NGA & CCSSO, 2010) as central to how students engage with mathematical content.
Indicator 3e.MLL
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program for MLLs and the identification of the research-based strategies.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Bridges in Mathematics partially meet the expectations that materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program for MLLs and the identification of research-based strategies. The materials explain the instructional approaches of the program for MLLs through general recommendations. The materials provide a cited list of literature and research that influenced the design of Bridges in Mathematics but do not include explanations of how the literature base is used in the instructional approaches of the program for MLLs.
The Introduction to each grade level provides an explanation of the instructional approaches of the program for MLLs. Before listing general recommendations, the materials state, “Bridges Teachers Guides include specific support suggestions to assist teachers with providing access and opportunity for all students, including multilingual learners (MLLs).” The materials then list the following recommendations:
“Flexibly pair multilingual learners with peers who demonstrate a range of language skills to allow flexible use of language and to support sensemaking. While MLLs should sometimes be paired with other MLLs, it is not appropriate to always pair MLLs together.
Allow students to work and collaborate in the language they are most comfortable speaking. Provide support in understanding the content, participating in mathematical discourse, and interacting with peers.
Give students multiple opportunities to share their ideas in different ways, including orally, in writing, and through gestures, drawings, and the use of models. Provide time for students to rehearse an explanation first with the teacher, a partner, or small group before sharing out. When students present orally, allow them to use visual representations to accompany and explain their work.
Ask clarifying questions to probe student ideas. Productive questions include:
‘How did you find ______? Can you show me how you found ________?’
‘How did you use this tool to _________? Can you show me?’
'What did you do first? What did you do next?’
‘I see you drew/wrote _____________. Can you tell me about that part?’
Provide sentence frames to support students in expressing ideas during Work Places and other instructional activities. Consider writing sentence frames on the board or posting them somewhere visible to students during math forums (grades 3–5), strategy shares, and whole-class math games to support language and facilitate the sharing of ideas.
Use the Word Resource Cards or Math Vocabulary app to provide visual support for vocabulary development. Show students the Word Resource Card and provide opportunities for them to discuss and share their prior knowledge related to the word or phrase. Unpack the vocabulary in the session using visuals and examples to clarify meaning for students. Ask students, ‘Can you restate that using (insert specific vocabulary word)?’ to support the use of the vocabulary used in the session.
Pair visual supports and gestures with language whenever possible. Visuals and gestures not only support MLLs but all learners with varying language needs. Visuals help to clarify students’ understanding of the content as well as shared directions.”
The above recommendations frame the material’s MLL approach, which aligns broadly with best practices for language development. However, the recommendations are framed generically for “…all students, including MLLs…” which does not outline the explicit purpose of ensuring MLLs are able to meet the standards by using language to perform disciplinary practices. Furthermore, while the recommendations reflect widely accepted practices, there are no direct citations between these recommendations and specific research-based frameworks or findings.
The Bridges Educator Site includes a document entitled Literature Base for Bridges in Mathematics Third Edition (extended), which lists citations of “influential works in mathematics education.” This introduction to this document states, “… these works influenced the design of Bridges in Mathematics Third Edition.” This document references several established sources in language development for MLLs, including:Bresser et al. (2009), Chval et al. (2021), Hill & Flynn (2006), and the Multilingual Learning Toolkit developed by the American Institute for Research.While the materials identify their literature base of influential works, this document does not reference these citations in the instructional approach for MLLs located in the Introduction to each grade level. The materials do not indicate how the strategies from these sources were selected, adapted, or systematically embedded throughout the curriculum for the explicit purpose of ensuring MLLs are able to meet the standards by using language to do disciplinary practices.
Indicator 3f
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Bridges in Mathematics Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for providing a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
Each grade level includes a Materials List outlining the manipulatives, print resources, and quantities needed for the year. In addition, each module contains a Materials Preparation section, and every session provides a table listing the specific items required. Examples include:
In Kindergarten, Unit 6, Three-Dimensional Shapes & Numbers Beyond 10, Module 3, Session 1, Materials, Warm-Up states, “Ten & More Numerals display cards; demonstration number rack.”
In Grade 1, Unit 7, One Hundred & Beyond, Module 2, Materials Preparation, Special Items states, “Session 1: Prepare a bag of Unifix cubes for every 2-3 students according to the instructions in the Preparation section for the session.”
In Grade 2, Unit 3, Addition & Subtraction Within 100, Module 3, Session 2, Materials, Problems & Investigations states, “large base ten number pieces (see Preparation); Base Ten Triple Spin Spinner.”
Indicator 3g
The assessment system provides consistent opportunities to determine student learning throughout the school year. The assessment system provides sufficient teacher guidance for evaluating student performance and determining instructional next steps.
The materials reviewed for Bridges in Mathematics Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for providing consistent opportunities to determine student learning throughout the school year. The assessment system provides sufficient teacher guidance for evaluating student performance and determining instructional next steps.
In the Assessment Guides for each grade level, the Formal Assessments section describes assessments administered throughout the year, including Beginning-of-Year Screeners, Checkpoints, and Unit Assessments. These assessments provide information about students’ prerequisite skills for upcoming instruction and their understanding of current grade-level standards. Scoring guides accompany the assessments and include guidance for evaluating student work and determining instructional next steps. The guides also reference Activities for Individual or Small-Group Reengagement that teachers may use to support student learning. Examples include:
In Kindergarten, Unit 7, Measurement & Teen Numbers, Module 1, Session 4, Assessment, Combinations to 5 & Equations Checkpoint is administered to individual students during Work Places. Teachers observe how students solve problems (e.g., automatic recall, counting, or using objects), record observations on the checkpoint form, and use the scoring guide to identify students for small-group reengagement activities.
In Grade 1, Unit 2, Developing Foundational Facts, Module 1, Session 1, Assessment, Unit 2 Screener — Interview is conducted with one student at a time while peers work independently. Teachers use the screener and scoring guide to note which students need additional support and receive recommendations for specific Work Places or other activities to reinforce learning.
In Grade 2, Assessment Guide, Unit 3, Addition & Subtraction Within One Hundred, Assessment. The Assessment answer key provides sample student responses and acceptable solution methods (e.g., using a number line in different ways). This guidance helps teachers evaluate student work and determine whether further instructional support is needed.
Indicator 3h
This is not an assessed indicator in Mathematics.
Indicator 3i
This is not an assessed indicator in Mathematics.
Criterion 3.2: Student Supports
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials are designed for each child’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The materials reviewed for Bridges in Mathematics, Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for Student Supports. The materials provide strategies to ensure that students in special populations can access grade-level content and meet or exceed grade-level standards. They offer regular extensions and opportunities for advanced students to engage with mathematics at greater depth. Across the series, the materials include varied approaches to learning tasks and offer multiple ways for students to demonstrate their understanding, along with opportunities for self-monitoring. Teachers are supported with strategies for using varied grouping methods. Supports are included for varying reading levels to ensure accessibility, and manipulatives—both virtual and physical, accurately represent mathematical concepts and, when appropriate, are connected to written methods. The materials provide some assessment accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge without altering the content. They also partially provide a range of representations of people and include guidance and support for educators to incorporate and build upon students’ cultural, social, and community backgrounds to enrich learning experiences.
Indicator 3j
Materials provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and meet or exceed grade-level standards, which support their regular and active participation in learning.
The materials reviewed for Bridges in Mathematics Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for providing strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and meet or exceed grade-level standards, which support their regular and active participation in learning.
The Teacher Guide explains that Work Places are designed to provide opportunities for assessment and differentiation, stating, “Each Work Place is accompanied by a guide that identifies the skills and concepts involved as well as suggestions for assessment and differentiation.” These guides provide strategies and supports intended to promote student engagement in mathematical tasks. Examples include:
In Kindergarten, Work Place Collection, Work Place Guides & Instructions, Work Place 1E Spill Five Beans, Assessment & Differentiation, Multilingual learners states, “Use gestures and repetition to tie the words spill, count, and beans to the action of spilling beans and counting them. Many students can access this game counting in their home language. Use Work Place Sentence Frames, located on the Bridges Educator Site, to support students in discussing their work with others.”
In Grade 1, Work Place Collection, Work Place Guides & Instructions, Work Place 3C Doubles Plus or Minus 1, Assessment & Differentiation states, “If you see that…: A student needs support to add or subtract 1. Differentiate: Support - Give the student Unifix cubes, a number rack, or both to use for adding or subtracting 1. Example: Tell them to use the cubes or number rack to double 3 to get 6. Then have them add 1 more cube (or bead) or take 1 cube (or bead) away.”
In Grade 2, Work Place Collection, Work Place Guides & Instructions, Work Place 2A The Subtraction Wheel, Assessment & Differentiation states, “If you see that…: A student could benefit from support to use more precise mathematical language related to equations. Differentiate: When playing the sample round with students, write the equation on the board each time a team completes a fact on the subtraction wheel. Have students practice saying the equations aloud. Example: Write 10 - 8 = 2 and have students say: Ten minus eight is equal to two.”
An additional program, Bridges Intervention, provides support and intervention through problem solving, visual models, and fluency development. The program is organized into nine volumes addressing major number concepts and skills across K–5 and includes small-group activities, practice pages, and partner games. All volumes are available to Bridges’ educators so they can provide targeted support as needed. Math specialists, interventionists, resource teachers, and support staff can also use these resources to give students the time and support necessary to make sense of mathematics.
Indicator 3k
Materials regularly provide extensions and/or opportunities for advanced students to engage with grade-level/course-level mathematics at greater depth.
The materials reviewed for Bridges in Mathematics Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for regularly providing extensions and/or opportunities for advanced students to engage with grade-level mathematics at greater depth.
The Teacher Guide at each grade level introduces Concept Quests as “a supplemental resource designed for kindergarten through grade 5” that provides “opportunities to extend and apply their learning.” Tasks are designed with “multiple entry points so that all students, regardless of backgrounds or ability, have equal access.” Kindergarten includes Excursion tasks, and grades 1–5 include both Excursions and Adventures. Excursions ask students to apply current mathematics in novel or authentic contexts, while Adventures are “more challenging” and extend understanding by connecting to other grade-level content or contexts. Each grade level includes seven sets of these tasks, found in Units 2–8 on the Bridges’ Educator Site.
In addition to Concept Quests, challenge problems and activities are embedded within sessions and assessments, offering further opportunities for advanced students to work with mathematics at greater depth. Examples include:
In Kindergarten, Concept Quests, Unit 3, 3D, Show Me 5, students create multiple representations of the number five using objects and pictures. An extension invites students to “pick a number between 5 and 10 and make different pictures,” providing an additional challenge for advanced learners.
In Grade 1, Unit 2, Developing Foundational Facts, Module 1, Session 3, Problems & Investigations, Playing Domino Add & Compare with a Partner, Challenge, “students turn up two dominoes on each turn and find the total number of dots on both dominoes.” The challenge specifies that students need “an entire set of double 6 dominoes or a half set of double 9.”
In Grade 2, Concept Quest, Unit 5, 5B, Nine Coins 1, students solve for different combinations of nine coins that total one dollar and are prompted to find additional solutions. The extension asks, “Can you make $2.00 with 9 coins? If you can, with what coins? If you can’t, what is the closest you can get and with what coins?” providing opportunities for advanced students to extend their reasoning.
Indicator 3l
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
Indicator 3m
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
Indicator 3m.MLL
Materials include guidance for intentional and flexible grouping structures for MLLs to ensure equitable participation.
The instructional materials for Grades K-2 of Bridges in Mathematics do not meet expectations for including guidance for intentional and flexible grouping structures for MLLs to ensure equitable participation.
The materials do not provide detailed teacher-facing guidance on flexible grouping structures that are tailored to the needs of MLLs. The Language Support section of the Introduction to each grade level lists general recommendations for language supports for MLLs, including, “Flexibly pair with peers who demonstrate a range of language skills to allow flexible use of language and to support sensemaking. While MLLs should sometimes be paired with other MLLs, it is not appropriate to always pair MLLs together.” This general recommendation does not include specific teacher guidance on using grouping strategies that encourage MLLs to leverage their oral language resources in order to engage with complex disciplinary ideas and practices, and to support each other in developing disciplinary language in English. Additionally, this general recommendation does not include teacher guidance on how to use language proficiency in grouping students depending upon the session's purpose and tasks.
At point-of-use within sessions, structured partner discourse routines are observed, such as the think-pair-share routine. However, these practices are presented as general discussion protocols, and they are not linked to specific strategies for supporting MLLs’ engagement or language development.
Indicator 3n
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
Indicator 3n.MLL
Assessments offer accommodations that allow MLLs to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Bridges in Mathematics do not meet expectations for providing accommodations that allow MLLs to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. The materials do not provide guidance for teachers to account for varied levels of English language proficiency without changing the content of the assessment, yet still allowing MLLs to show grade level mastery regardless of language ability.
As noted in the report for 3n, Unit Assessments and Checkpoints are provided and used to evaluate student learning. Each unit includes a Spanish version of the assessments. While the inclusion of Spanish-language assessments may support students whose primary language is Spanish, it does not constitute a full range of accommodations for the broader population of MLLs with diverse linguistic backgrounds. Additionally, the Spanish version of the assessments mirrors the English versions, which assume prior mastery of mathematical vocabulary in the students’ home language, which is not a supportive accommodation if instruction is primarily delivered in English.
Within each grade levels’ Assessment Guide, Section 4: Differentiation & Intervention contains a subsection titled Assessing and Supporting Multilingual Learners. Here, the materials state, “Students who are still learning English might find it difficult to fully demonstrate their understanding in English. This can lead to conflating language ability with math knowledge and understanding. Therefore, it is important to make a concerted effort to focus on these learners’ strengths and avoid underestimating their mathematical ability.” This section continues with a brief description of five considerations from the American Institutes for Research’s Multilingual Learner Toolkit (2021), including:
“Collaborate with co-teachers and caregivers to create language- and content-learning goals….
Use assessment results to inform instruction….
Monitor progress by drawing from a variety of formative assessment tools….
Assess students in their home language….
Study and understand the process of second-language acquisition.”
This guidance emphasizes general collaboration and instructional planning but lacks specific accommodations provided to ensure that MLLs can access assessments. Additionally, the materials lack guidance for teachers to account for varied levels of English language proficiency to allow MLLs to show grade-level mastery regardless of language ability.
Indicator 3o
Materials provide a range of representation of people and include detailed instructions and support for educators to effectively incorporate and draw upon students’ different cultural, social, and community backgrounds to enrich learning experiences.
Indicator 3p
Materials provide supports for different reading levels to ensure accessibility for students.
Indicator 3q
Manipulatives, both virtual and physical, are accurate representations of the mathematical objects they represent and, when appropriate, are connected to written methods.
The materials reviewed for Bridges in Mathematics Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for providing manipulatives that are accurate representations of mathematical objects and are connected to written methods when appropriate. Examples include:
In Kindergarten, Unit 1, Numbers to 5 & 10, Module 2, Session 1, Math Practice in Action, students explore the 5-frame as a visual model that is used throughout the year to support fluency with combinations within 5.
In Grade 1, Unit 1, Numbers All Around Us, Module 2, Session 5, Problems & Investigations, students draw Double 10-Frame Dot Cards, solve the corresponding addition fact, and record the sum on their sheet. This connects the visual representation to written notation.
In Grade 2, Unit 2, Setting Foundations for Place Value & Measurement, Module 1, Session 3, Problems & Investigations, students scoop and count 50 beans, grouping them into portion cups of 10, which reinforces place value and connects the concrete representation to numerical recording.
Criterion 3.3: Intentional Design
Materials include a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
The materials for Bridges in Mathematics, Kindergarten through Grade 2 partially integrate technology, including interactive tools, virtual manipulatives, and dynamic mathematics software, to engage students with grade-level standards. Teacher guidance is provided to support the use of embedded technology in enhancing student learning. However, the materials do not include or reference digital tools that facilitate collaboration among teachers or students. The visual design supports student engagement with the content and is clear and organized without being distracting.
Indicator 3r
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
Indicator 3s
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
Indicator 3t
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
Indicator 3u
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.