High School - Gateway 2
Back to High School Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Gateway 2 - Partially Meets Expectations | 75% |
|---|---|
Criterion 2.1: Rigor | 7 / 8 |
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices | 5 / 8 |
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
Rigor and Balance: The instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by giving appropriate attention to: developing students' conceptual understanding; procedural skill and fluency; and engaging applications.
The instructional materials reviewed for the Interactive Mathematics Program series meet the expectation that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. Overall, conceptual understanding and application are thoroughly attended to, but students are provided limited opportunities to develop procedural skills and fluencies.
Indicator 2a
Attention to Conceptual Understanding: The materials support the intentional development of students' conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
The instructional materials for the Interactive Mathematics Program series meet expectations that the materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific standards or cluster headings. The instructional materials develop conceptual understanding and provide opportunities for students to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding throughout the series.
Examples of the materials developing conceptual understanding and providing opportunities for students to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding are highlighted below:
- A-APR.B: In Year 2, Fireworks, A Quadratic Rocket, page 17, the Group Activity connects the number of x-intercepts with the shape of the parabola. Quadratic functions are given in vertex form, and students determine where the vertex lies, whether the parabola is concave up or concave down, and use these facts to determine how many x-intercepts it has. In the Glossary on page 504 in Year 2, the zero product rule is defined. This is explored in Year 2, Fireworks, Intercepts and Factoring, page 47, Group Activity, where students factor to find zeros and make a statement that connects the idea of x intercepts to “the values of x that make y = 0.” There are subsequent activities in Year 2, Fireworks that students independently engage in factoring expressions, graphing parabolas, and solving a cattle pen application using the factored form and the x-intercepts. Year 3, The World of Functions, Supplemental Activities, page 423 connects the idea between roots, equations, and graphs of polynomial functions. Note the term roots is used rather than zeros.
- A-REI.A: In Year 1, The Overland Trail, pages 92-96, students build understanding around balancing equations and explain what they are doing, which is pertinent in the conceptual development for this cluster of standards. In Year 2, Fireworks, Supplemental Activities, pages 68-69, students are exposed to extraneous solutions. Students are asked “See if you can find a rule for determining when an extraneous solution will occur.”
- A-REI.10: In Year 1, The Overland Trail, The Graph Tells a Story, page 51, students are given in-out relationships to make a table, plot the ordered pairs, and sketch a graph. Students connect “in and out” to independent and dependent variables on a graph and then graph equations on a coordinate plane. In the same year, All About Alice, Curiouser and Curiouser!, page 443, students use a similar method to graph y=2x. In Year 3, The World of Functions, Going to the Limit, pages 343-344, students investigate rational function graphs.
- F-IF.A: In Year 1, The Overland Trail, The Importance of Patterns, page 12 and The Graph Tells a Story, pages 49-51, students use in and out tables and real-world context to develop the idea of functions. Students extend their idea of functions using sequences later on in The Overland Trail, Supplemental Activities, page 104 where students find next terms and write equations for the sequences.
- G-SRT.6: Year 1, Shadows, pages 305-309 provide students a task to draw a right triangle and investigate the idea of the ratios that lead to defining sine, cosine, and tangent. Students are asked if their classmates will get similar results for their ratios and have to “Explain in detail why or why not.”
- S-ID.7: Year 1, The Overland Trail, page 66 begins to develop the idea of slope by giving real-world scenarios, and students write linear equations and answer questions. Pages 74 and 75 extend the conceptual development of slope by providing opportunities for students to find equations of real-world scenarios and answer questions related to the rate and the starting point (y-intercept). It should be noted that rate of change, slope, and y-intercept are not used.
Indicator 2b
Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: The materials provide intentional opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
The instructional materials for the Interactive Mathematics Program series partially meet expectations that the materials provide intentional opportunities for students to develop procedural skills, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
Students’ independent demonstration of procedural skills is often limited to a few problems. The following are examples of how the instructional materials provide students with limited opportunities to independently demonstrate procedural skills throughout the series.
- N-RN.2: Students work with rational exponents in Year 1, All About Exponents, pages 434-435 and Year 1, All About Alice: Curiouser and Curiouser!, pages 443-444 and 447-448. However, Year 1, All About Alice: Curiouser and Curiouser!, pages 449-450 has limited practice for students to rewrite expressions involving radicals using the properties of exponents.
- N-CN.7 and A-REI.4b: Quadratic equations with complex solutions are introduced in Year 3, High Dive: A Falling Start, page 262. There are three problems where students develop and independently demonstrate solving quadratic equations with complex solutions. Overall, students have limited practice at recognizing when the quadratic formula will result in complex solutions.
- A-APR.6: Year 3, The World of Functions: Supplemental Activities, page 418, includes two examples of long division. Students are given three problems to practice polynomial division.
- F-BF.3: Year 2, Fireworks, A Quadratic Rocket, pages 11-14 introduces the idea of transformations of quadratic functions and includes limited problems for students to independently demonstrate transforming functions on their own. Also, f(kx) is not included in these pages. Year 3, The World of Functions: Transforming Functions, pages 388 - 392 does include f(kx) for sine functions. Students have minimal practice in looking at functions and determining the transformation of the graph. They are given a graph to complete four different transformations. Later they complete four single transformations using a table. Students are not given practice looking at graphs to find the value of k.
- F-TF.2: Reviewers found few tasks related to radian measures of angles on the unit circle. They are located in Year 3, High Dive, Supplemental Activities, pages 308-310.
- G-GPE.5: There is minimal evidence students develop procedural skills in using the criteria for perpendicular and parallel lines to solve problems. In Year 2, Geometry by Design: Isometric Transformations, page 149, the slope criteria for perpendicular lines is used to find the equation of the line that passes through a given point and is perpendicular to a line for two exercises. In a Group Activity in Year 2, Small World, Isn’t It?: All in a Row, page 404 and Small World Isn’t It?: Supplemental Activities, page 466, students develop the concept that parallel lines have the same slope.
Indicator 2c
Attention to Applications: The materials support the intentional development of students' ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
The instructional materials for Interactive Mathematics Program series meet expectations that the materials support the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
Students engage in and practice problem solving, solve non-routine problems, and apply math in contextual situations with increasing sophistication across the courses.
Examples of engaging high school applications in real-world contexts are shown below:
- N-Q.1: Students choose and interpret the scale and origin in graphs and data displays frequently, including choosing axes for various real-world situations in Year 1, The Overland Trail, The Graph Tells a Story, pages 46-47. Students also use an appropriate scale as they graph data on supplies settlers used while travelling by wagon train in Year 1, The Overland Trial, pages 55 and 59. In Year 1, Cookies, Cookies and the University, page 389, students make an appropriate graph to decide how many cookies to produce for maximum profit.
- A-SSE.3: In Year 2, students use equivalent forms of expressions to show properties of quantities represented by those expressions as they learn about relationships between equations and graphs of quadratic functions. In Fireworks, A Quadratic Rocket, pages 4-5, 11-12, and 14-17; The Form of It All, pages 21-27 and 29-30; Putting Quadratics to Use, pages 36-38 and 41; and Back to Bayside High, page 45, students also use completing the square to rewrite quadratic equations to solve problems involving rockets.
- G-SRT.5: Students apply triangle congruence and similarity to solve problems through indirect measurement in various contexts for Year 1, Shadows, The Lamp Shadow, pages 294-298 and 302 and then use this idea to develop and use trigonometric ratios for Year 1, Shadows, The Sun Shadow, pages 305-313.
- F-IF.4: Students sketch graphs showing key features of the relationship between two quantities for given stories in Year 3, The World of Functions, The What and Why of Functions, pages 320-321 and 326.
- F-IF.6: Students calculate and interpret the average rate of change in a number of contexts, including graphs showing distance travelled each day in Year 2, Small World, Isn’t It?, Average Growth, page 392 and 396; a graph showing population growth in Year 2, Small World, Isn’t It?, page 398; and a graph of an equation representing the height of a falling object in Small World, Isn’t It?, Beyond Linearity, page 415.
Indicator 2d
Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. The three aspects are balanced with respect to the standards being addressed.
The instructional materials for Interactive Mathematics Program series meet expectations that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately.
All units emphasize applications. In general, tasks use a real-world context, and units are organized around an overarching real-world problem. Conceptual understanding is developed through the applications by teaching through problem solving. Units often feature limited opportunities for practicing procedural skills, but when present, procedural skills are integrated into the problem-solving scenarios.
Multiple aspects of rigor are engaged simultaneously to develop students’ mathematical understanding of a single topic/unit of study throughout the materials. Examples of this include:
- In Year 1, Overland Trail, Setting Out with Variables, pages 33-39, procedural skills and applications are integrated. Students find the value of algebraic expressions and solve algebraic equations in the context of planning a trip by wagon train.
- In Year 2, Fireworks, The Form of It All, pages 19-32, students build a conceptual understanding of completing the square by working with area models of multiplication, applying those area models to the distributive property of multiplication over addition and the multiplication of binomial expressions, and using those ideas to derive the process of completing the square. In Putting Quadratics to Use, pages 33-41, students use completing the square to solve maximization problems involving quadratic functions, with practice of this procedural skill distributed throughout the unit and included in Supplemental Activities, pages 72, 73, and 77.
- In Year 3, The World of Functions, page 318, students reason about the relationship between speed and stopping distance using multiple representations as they are introduced to the unit problem. Students continue to make connections between a verbal description and an appropriate graph on pages 320-323 and 326. Continuing in World of Functions, Tables, students use tables to explore patterns and properties of linear, quadratic, cubic, and exponential functions, pages 325, 327, 330-334, 339, then assign functions to tables in Who’s Who?, page 353. The unit concludes with students returning to the unit problem to explain what function family they think best represents data given in a table.
There are some instances where procedural skills activities are not presented simultaneously with other aspects of rigor. Examples of this include:
- In Year 1, Overland Trail, Reaching the Unknown, page 92, students solve one-step, two-step and multi-step equations containing variables on both sides of the equal sign.
- In Year 1, Shadows, The Shape of It, pages 269, 270, and 272, students create proportions based on similar figures and solve the proportions to find the lengths of missing sides.
- In Year 1, Cookies, Points of Intersection, page 387, students solve linear equations and linear systems.
- In Year 2, Fireworks, Intercepts and Factoring, page 48, students factor quadratic equations.
- In Year 2, Small World, Isn’t It?, All in a Row, page 410, students find the equation of a line, given specific information.
The instructional materials embed conceptual understanding and application in contexts such that these two aspects of rigor are simultaneously being addressed. For example:
- In Year 2, Small World, Isn’t It?, All in a Row, page 404, students make a connection between the slope of parallel lines and the graph of parallel lines within the context of teammates saving money to help buy new basketball uniforms. They develop formulas to describe the amount of money each of the friends has at any time and consider how these formulas relate to their respective slopes and graphs.
- In Year 3, The World of Functions, Composing Functions, page 373, students develop their conceptual understanding of composition within the context of a student who is trying to save enough money to travel across the country. Students can either make a graph or a table to show student earnings as they apply one function to another function.
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice
The instructional materials for the Interactive Mathematics Program series partially meet expectations that the materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice. The instructional materials develop each of the Mathematical Practices, except for MP5 and MP6. For MP5, students do not have opportunities to choose an appropriate tool to use to solve a problem because the materials include directions that specify which tool(s) to use, and for MP6, the materials do not always use precise mathematical vocabulary and definitions.
The instructional materials do not identify the MPs in the units or activities for teachers or students. At the beginning of each unit, there is a document titled "(Unit Name) and the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics," and in each of these documents, there is the following general statement, "The eight Standards for Mathematical Practice are addressed exceptionally well throughout the IMP curriculum." A publisher-provided document, that is separate from the digital materials, entitled "Correlation of Interactive Mathematics Program (IMP), Years 1-4, Common Core Edition (2014) to Common Core State Standards (June 2010)", lists activities within courses for each MP that are representative of the MP, but other than a description of the activity, there is no identification of the MPs for those activities. The lack of identification of the MPs is reflected in the scoring of indicator 2e, and does not affect the scoring of indicators 2f, 2g, or 2h.
Indicator 2e
The materials support the intentional development of overarching, mathematical practices (MPs 1 and 6), in connection to the high school content standards, as required by the mathematical practice standards.
The instructional materials for Interactive Mathematics Program series do not meet expectations that the materials support the intentional development of overarching, mathematical practices (MPs 1 and 6), in connection to the high school content standards. In addition to not developing MP6 to its full intent, the materials do not identify the MPs for teachers or students as evidenced in the EdReports.org Criterion Summary for the MPs.
Students often make sense of problems and persevere in solving them (MP1), and several tasks address a general problem-solving process and are not connected to the high school content standards. There is intentional development of MP1 across the series, but MP6 is not developed to its full intent as the materials do not always use precise mathematical vocabulary and definitions.
Problems of the Week (POW) provide opportunities to make sense of problems and persevere in solving them (MP1). Examples include:
- In Year 1, The Pit and the Pendulum, Edgar Allan Poe - Master of Suspense, POW 5, pages 140-141, the materials present a modified chess board and explain how a knight moves. Students determine if it is possible to move each knight from one spot on the board to another spot on the modified board. In order to determine if the movements are possible, students make sense of how a knight moves, and they also make sense of how to record the movements of the knights. Students persevere in the task as they record multiple combinations of moves in order to determine if the knights can land in the desired spaces on the modified board.
- In Year 2, The Game of Pig, Pictures of Probability, POW 7, pages 213-214, pairs of students play a game in which each can remove a limited number of objects from a group (e.g., remove one, two, or three objects from a group of ten). The winner is the player who takes out the last object. After playing several variations of the game, students describe their best strategies, make generalizations about the structure of the game, and give justification for their findings.
- In Year 3, Pennant Fever, The Birthday Problem, POW 2, pages 20-21, students examine the Monty Hall problem where a contestant is presented with three doors. Behind two of the doors are worthless prizes, and behind the third door is a new car. The contestant picks a door, and a worthless prize is revealed behind one of the two doors that were not picked. The contestant then decides whether to keep the original door selected or switch to the door that was not revealed. Students make sense of how to simulate the game in order to determine a strategy that produces the best chance for winning the car. The strategy is supported by an explanation that includes the probabilities involved in the problem.
The materials do not develop MP6 to its full intent as they do not always use precise mathematical vocabulary and definitions. Examples of how the materials do not use precise mathematical vocabulary and definitions include:
- Functions are introduced in Year 1, The Overland Trail, within the context of in-out tables and are defined in the Glossary on page 482 as “a process or rule for determining the numerical value of one variable in terms of another. A function is often represented as a set of number pairs in which the second number is determined by the first, according to the function rule.” The materials do not use the definition of a function as assigning each element of the domain exactly one element of the range (F-IF.1).
- In Year 1, The Pit and the Pendulum, Supplemental Activities, page 234, the term domain is defined as “intervals on the x-axis” and used in relationship to piecewise functions, and the term range is not defined or used in relationship to functions in Year 1. In Year 2, Small World, Isn’t It?, Supplemental Activities, pages 476-477, the terms domain and range are examined in the context of the relationship between exponential and logarithmic functions. In Year 3, The World of Functions, Supplemental Activities, pages 400-401, students determine the domains of rational and radical expressions. The terms domain and range are not used or defined for other types of functions, including polynomial functions, in the series.
- In Year 2, Geometry by Design, Do It Like the Ancients, page 104, the definition of congruent is written as, “Two figures are congruent if they can be placed one on top of the other, and they match up perfectly.” The materials do not define congruence in terms of rigid motions.
- In Year 3, High Dive, The Height and the Sine, page 205, students model the movement of a Ferris Wheel using a trigonometric function and examine how the amplitude, period, and frequency affect the graph and equation modeling the Ferris Wheel. The materials do not use the term frequency when referring to trigonometric functions, but in Exercise 1, students modify the frequency by changing the period of the trigonometric graph.
- The term zeros is used in Year 3, High Dive, Supplemental Activities, page 306, but there is no other evidence for the use of this term. The term is also not used in any of the problems that are a part of the Supplemental Activity on page 306.
- The review did not find any evidence of the use of the term interquartile range (S-ID.2).
Indicator 2f
The materials support the intentional development of reasoning and explaining (MPs 2 and 3), in connection to the high school content standards, as required by the mathematical practice standards.
The instructional materials for Interactive Mathematics Program series meet expectations that the materials support the intentional development of reasoning and explaining (MPs 2 and 3), in connection to the high school content standards. MP2 and MP3 are used to enrich the mathematical content throughout the series, and there is intentional development of MP2 and MP3 that reaches the full intent of the MPs.
Students often reason abstractly and quantitatively (MP2). Examples include:
- In Year 1, The Overland Trail, The Graph Tells a Story, pages 49-50, students answer a series of questions that lead them to analyze graphs, create corresponding tables, and write rules based on the information.
- In Year 2, Geometry by Design, Isometric Transformations, page 148, students solve a problem about a right triangle with a given slope and then describe a general solution for any slope.
- In Year 3, High Dive, Falling, Falling, Falling, pages 217-218, students are given a particular example of the distance travelled by a falling object and develop a general formula for the height of a falling object after a given number of seconds.
Students often construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others (MP3). Examples include:
- In Year 1, All About Alice, Curiouser and Curiouser, pages 447-448, three students share their strategy for shrinking the size of a house while keeping the shape exactly the same. Students critique the reasoning of others as they determine whether each strategy works and explain why the method does or does not work.
- In Year 2, Geometry by Design, Dilation, page 161, a student seeks advice from five friends about how to enlarge a figure on a copier. Students critique each friend’s response as to whether it produces the desired enlargement and if it doesn’t then students determine what size enlargement was made.
- In Year 3, Is There Really a Difference?, Data, Data, Data, page 431, a scenario is given where students are constructing a mathematical argument for a jury. The student then becomes a member of the jury to see if there is enough evidence. This scenario develops further by having students include an explanation of additional evidence that might be needed to win the case.
Indicator 2g
The materials support the intentional development of modeling and using tools (MPs 4 and 5), in connection to the high school content standards, as required by the mathematical practice standards.
The instructional materials for Interactive Mathematics Program series partially meet expectations that the materials support the intentional development of modeling and using tools (MPs 4 and 5), in connection to the high school content standards. Students make numerous models and use tools to solve real-world problems, but they are typically told which tool to use.
Students often model with mathematics (MP4). Examples include:
- In Year 1, The Overland Trail, The Graph Tells a Story, page 43, students use a graph to answer questions about situations and sketch a graph to represent situations.
- In Year 2, Fireworks, The Form of It All, pages 31-32, students write an equation to represent a real-world situation involving the volume of a rectangular figure.
- In Year 3, Is There Really a Difference?, Data, Data, Data, page 428, students use diagrams or organized lists to develop a plan to maximize the number of phone calls that can be made under given conditions.
In the series, students often use tools, but students generally do not choose which tool to use. Some examples of not choosing a tool include:
- In Year 1, The Overland Trail, Traveling at a Constant Rate, page 67, students are directed to use a graphing calculator to plot data and find a linear function that approximates the data. Students do not have the opportunity to make decisions about whether to construct a graph by hand or use a calculator nor do they consider the advantages/limitations of finding possible linear functions by guess and check or using the calculator.
- In Year 2, Do Bees Build It Best?, Area, Geoboards, and Trigonometry, pages 298-299, the materials explicitly use geoboards to derive the formula for the area of a triangle. By explicitly using geoboards, the materials take away the opportunities for students to determine what tool(s) would be helpful to derive the formula for the area of a triangle, as well as identify the strength and limitations of the tool(s).
- In Year 3, Pennant Fever, Trees and Baseball, page 12, the materials state that “one of the best techniques for analyzing situations like the baseball problem is the tree diagram,” and students read that “over the next several days, you’ll apply this technique to several situations.” These directions restrict the students’ opportunity to choose and use appropriate tools strategically.
Indicator 2h
The materials support the intentional development of seeing structure and generalizing (MPs 7 and 8), in connection to the high school content standards, as required by the mathematical practice standards.
The instructional materials for Interactive Mathematics Program series meet expectations that the materials support the intentional development of seeing structure and generalizing (MP7 and MP8), in connection to the high school content standards. In the instructional materials, students find and use patterns and generalize findings from regularity in repeated reasoning.
Students often look for and make use of structure (MP7). Examples include:
- In Year 1, All About Alice, Extending Exponentiation, pages 152-153, students examine a list of integer powers of 2 from -4 to 5, describe the structure they see, and use their results to find other powers of 2 with negative exponents.
- In Year 2, Fireworks, The Form of It All, pages 22-23, students consider the multiplication of two two-digit numbers using an area model. The structure of an area model is built upon in pages 24-25 as students multiply algebraic expressions using the same format. Factoring is informally introduced using the area model in Exercise 4 on page 25 when students are given the total area and seek to find the length and width to set the stage for factoring quadratic expressions using this model later in Fireworks, Intercepts and Factoring, page 47.
- In Year 3, Pennant Fever, Baseball and Counting, students write formulas for combinations and permutations by looking for structure in their work with specific examples from previous activities.
Students often look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning (MP8). Examples include:
- In Year 1, Shadows, The Shape of It, page 254, students use protractors to discover the angle sums of triangles and quadrilaterals. Students build upon this knowledge in the following activity on page 255 as they consider other polygons. During this activity, students generalize their findings for a few specific polygons to find an expression for the sum of the angles in a polygon as a function of the number of its sides.
- In Year 2, Small World, Isn’t It?, Average Growth, pages 398-399, students find the rate of change of a function from several graphs of real-world situations and use these repeated examples to determine a general expression for rate of change of a linear function given any two ordered pairs.
- In Year 3, The World of Functions, Tables, page 325, students consider f(x) = 4x + 7 and look for a pattern using equally-spaced inputs. Students then consider other linear functions of their own choosing and reach a generalized statement regarding the pattern in constant differences in outputs within a table for all linear functions. On page 338, students work with concrete examples and then generalize to reach a conclusion regarding constant, second differences in outputs with constant changes in x within a table for all quadratic functions.