2024
Into Science

Kindergarten - Gateway 1

Back to Kindergarten Overview
Cover for Into Science
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Designed for NGSS

Gateway 1 - Partially Meets Expectations
57%
Criterion 1.1: Three-Dimensional Learning
12 / 16
Criterion 1.2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning
4 / 12

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet expectations for Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS; Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning partially meets expectations and Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning does not meet expectations.

Criterion 1.1: Three-Dimensional Learning

12 / 16

Materials are designed for three-dimensional learning and assessment.

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet expectations for Criterion 1a-1c: Three-Dimensional Learning. The materials consistently include integration of the three dimensions in at least one learning opportunity per learning sequence. Learning sequences are inconsistently designed for student opportunity to engage in sensemaking with the three dimensions. The materials consistently provide three-dimensional learning objectives at the sequence level that build towards the performance expectations for the larger unit, and consistently use summative assessments to reveal student knowledge and use of the three dimensions to support the targeted three-dimensional learning objectives. Formative assessments inconsistently provide information on learning objectives.

Narrative Only

Indicator 1a

Narrative Only

Materials are designed to integrate the Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) into student learning.

Indicator 1a.i

4 / 4

Materials consistently integrate the three dimensions in student learning opportunities.

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they are designed to integrate the Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) into student learning opportunities. 

Throughout the Kindergarten materials, nearly all learning sequences include at least one learning opportunity that incorporates all three dimensions. Units are typically two to three lessons long, and lessons are composed of four to seven learning opportunities called Explorations. The Hands-On Explorations are typically where the three dimensions are found together in a single opportunity. In these explorations, students engage in asking a question related to the concept introduced with an opening video or image, and participate in hands-on and/or exploratory collaborative learning opportunities. A notable exception is Unit 1. This unit is an engineering unit and not connected to any DCIs in life, physical, or earth and space science. 

Examples of learning opportunities within the materials that integrate all three dimensions:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 2, Lesson 1, Exploration 2: Plants and Sunlight, students determine how sunlight affects plant growth. Students observe plants that have been either kept in sunlight or the dark for five days and record patterns they observe in a table (SEP-DATA-P1, CCC-PAT-P1). Students use the evidence they collect to write a claim about the effect of sunlight on plants (SEP-CEDS-P1, DCI-LS2.A-P1).

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 4, Lesson 2, Exploration 2: Weather Patterns, students observe patterns in weather by monitoring weather over a period of time. Students observe an image of a boy watching it rain and ask a question about weather patterns (SEP-AQDP-P1). Next, students observe and record the weather for five days (SEP-DATA-P1, SEP-INV-P4). Students look for patterns in their data (CCC-PAT-P1), then make a claim using their evidence about weather patterns (DCI-ESS2.D-P1, SEP-ARG-P6).

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 5, Lesson 1, Exploration 1: Push or Pull, students investigate if a wooden block can be moved with a push or a pull. After viewing a picture of a child pushing a shopping cart and reading about how pushes and pulls can make objects move, students ask a question about motion (SEP-AQDP-P1). Students are then given a block, a craft stick, and a piece of string. They move the block with the stick and then with the string. Students then make a claim about the ways in which they move the blocks and provide evidence from their firsthand observations to explain that pushing or pulling an object can change its speed and/or direction (SEP-CEDS-P1, DCI-PS2.A-P2, and CCC-CE-P2). 

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 5, Lesson 2, Exploration 1: Roll a Ball, with guidance, students plan and conduct an investigation to determine what happens to the motion of two balls when they collide. Students view a picture of a bowling ball crashing into pins. They ask a question about what happens when objects bump into each other (SEP-AQDP-P1). Students then plan and conduct an investigation to observe and describe what happens when two rolling balls collide. They record their observations and use that evidence to make a claim about how the collision affected the motion of each ball (SEP-DATA-P2, SEP-CEDS-P1, CCC-CE-E1, and DCI-PS2.B-P1).

Indicator 1a.ii

2 / 4

Materials consistently support meaningful student sensemaking with the three dimensions.

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet expectations that they consistently support meaningful student sensemaking with the three dimensions.

Across Kindergarten, multiple learning sequences include opportunities for students to engage in sensemaking using all three dimensions. In a few sequences, students engage in sensemaking with two dimensions. In some cases student sensemaking takes place across the entire sequence and in others student sensemaking happens within a single learning opportunity. In cases where there is only two-dimensional sensemaking, a CCC is missing. When sequences do not engage students in sensemaking, they typically include tasks for students to recall information or apply the SEPs or CCCs in isolation, however, there is a missed opportunity to provide students the opportunity to use SEPs and CCCs in concert to make sense of a DCI.

Examples of materials that are designed for SEPs and CCCs to meaningfully support student sensemaking with the other dimensions:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 2, Lesson 1: What Plants Need, students determine what plants need and how sunlight affects plant growth. Students make sense of the concept that plants stay green and tall when they have sunlight and water and lose their color and wilt when they do not. Students plan an investigation (SEP-INV-P1) to determine the effect of water (CCC-CE-P2) on plant growth. Students use their evidence to make a claim that plants need water to grow (SEP-CEDS-P2, DCI-LS2.A-P1). Students then use observations (SEP-DATA-P1) of plants kept in the light and dark to make a claim that plants need sunlight to live and grow (SEP-CEDS-P1).

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 4, Lesson 1: Protection from the Sun, students engage in a learning sequence that explores the effects of sunlight on objects. Students compare the temperatures of cups of water left in or out of sunlight to make the claim that an object left in the sun will be warmer than an object out of it (CCC-CE-P2, SEP-CEDS-P1, and DCI-PS3.B-P1). Students then design and build a shade structure and use it to conduct an investigation to determine that a rock protected by the shade will be cooler than a rock left in the sun (DCI-ETS1.B-P1, DCI-PS3.B-P1). Students use these explorations to make sense that people will feel cooler inside of a tent because they are protected from the light of the sun. 

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 5, Lesson 1: All About Motion, students engage in a learning sequence to explore how pushes and pulls can change the speed and direction of moving objects. Students explore moving a wooden block with a stick and then with a string. Students then make a claim about the ways in which they move the blocks and provide evidence from their firsthand observations to explain that pushing or pulling an object can change its speed and/or direction (SEP-CEDS-P1, DCI-PS2.A-P2, and CCC-CE-P2). With the teacher’s help, students plan, share, improve, and conduct a collaborative investigation to move a ball in different directions and at different speeds using a piece of cardboard (SEP-INV-P1). The teacher directs students to fan the ball slowly and quickly and make observations. Students develop a claim about how they changed the speed and direction of the ball by fanning the cardboard faster or slower (SEP-CEDS-P1, CCC-CE-PE1, and DCI-PS2.A-P2).

Examples of materials that are designed for SEPs OR CCCs to meaningfully support student sensemaking with the other dimensions:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 1: Plants and Animals Make Changes, students engage in a learning sequence to make sense of how plants and animals can change their environment. Students make observations about what they see in a worm home each day for three days (SEP-DATA-P1). Students use their observations to help them explain (SEP-CEDS-P1) how worms change their environment (DCI-ESS2.E-P1). Students look at pictures of plants that have changed their environment and make a claim, citing their evidence about why/how plants change their environment (DCI-ESS2.E-P1). Finally, students design a playground and share their designs with other students. There is a missed opportunity for students to use a CCC to help them make sense of the DCI. 

Examples of materials that are not designed for SEPs and CCCs to meaningfully support student sensemaking with the other dimensions:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 2, Lesson 3: Where Plants and Animals Live, students engage in a learning sequence that matches animals and plants to the environments where they live. Students match animal picture cards to the environments they live in and identify that they live there to get what they need (DCI-LS4.D-P1). Students make observations of two plants; one that is watered every day and one that is watered once a week (SEP-DATA-P1). Students are told that plants live in wet or dry climates based on what they need, and that not all plants can live in wet climates and not all plants can live in dry climates. There is a missed opportunity for students to engage in making sense of the DCI in this lesson, they use the information they are told to answer the Can You Explain It? question that plants and animals live in the desert to get what they need. 

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 2: Natural Resources, students engage in a learning sequence to understand what natural resources are and how to reduce trash. Students look at images of items made from natural resources and match them with a natural resource (a tree, water, or soil). Students observe an image of land next to water that is covered in trash. Students are then asked to design a solution to reduce trash (DCI-ESS3.C-P1) and share it with a partner. There is a missed opportunity for students to use SEPs or CCCs to help them make sense of the DCI in this learning sequence.

Indicator 1b

2 / 4

Materials are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence for three-dimensional learning.

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet expectations that they are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence for the three-dimensional learning in the instructional materials.

In Kindergarten, materials provide three-dimensional lesson objectives tied to performance expectations. Each lesson includes a Lesson Objective stating what students will do in the subsequent explorations. The lesson objectives are supported by the Making 3D Connections feature, which names which performance expectations the lesson is building to and the elements of the three-dimensions that students are supposed to be engaged in. The exception is Unit 1, which only includes engineering performance expectations and does not include DCIs from life, physical, or earth and space science.

Each lesson includes multiple opportunities for formative assessment. The assessments, however, do not consistently reveal student knowledge of all of the elements of the lesson objectives. There is a Making Sense question at the end of each hands-on exploration that asks students to connect the exploration content to the publisher identified phenomenon or science concept presented at the start of the Lesson. This question is most often connected to a DCI. Can You Explain It? questions usually mirror the questions found in the Making Sense section. The remaining explorations also include Apply What You Know formative assessments that typically address a DCI. At the end of the lesson, the materials provide a Self Check quiz. This quiz consists of three-four multiple-choice or matching questions that rely heavily on pictures. These questions most often assess student knowledge of one dimension, typically a DCI or a portion of an SEP. The materials miss several opportunities to assess student understanding of SEPs and CCCs.

The materials inconsistently incorporate tasks for purposes of supporting the instructional process. They provide suggested responses or scoring guidelines, but only provide support for adjusting instruction for the hands-on explorations. 

Examples of lessons that have three-dimensional learning objectives, formative assessment tasks do not assess student knowledge of all (three) dimensions in the learning objective, and provide limited guidance to support the instructional process:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 1: Plants and Animals Make Changes, the three-dimensional lesson objective is “Children can use evidence to explain how living things can change their environments to get what they need to grow” and is connected to performance expectation K-ESS2-2. Formative assessment is embedded in the Making Sense, Can You Explain It?, Apply What You Know, and Self Check portions of the learning sequence. The Making Sense and Can You Explain It? questions ask students to explain why plants change their environment (DCI-ESS2.E-P1, SEP-ARG-P6). In an Apply What You Know assessment, students must show how people change the environment to get what they need (DCI-ESS3.C-P1). There is a missed opportunity to assess CCC-SYS-P2. While the materials provide remediation guidance for hand-on explorations, the other formative assessments only include sample answers and scoring guidelines.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 2: Natural Resources, the three-dimensional learning objective is “Children can model the relationship between natural resources and how people use them. Children can communicate solutions that will reduce their impact on the environment,” and is connected to performance expectations K-ESS3-1 and K-ESS3-3. Formative assessment is embedded in the Making Sense, Can You Explain It?, Apply What You Know, and Self Check portions of the learning sequence. The Can You Explain It? and Making Sense questions ask students about why and how people should reduce trash and reuse resources (DCI-ESS3.C-P1). In Apply What You Know assessments, students write how humans use a natural resource (DCI-ESS3.A-P1) and share a plan for recycling or reusing resources (SEP-INFO-P4). There is a missed opportunity to assess SEP-MOD-P3, CCC-SYS-P2, and CCC-CE-P1. While the materials provide remediation guidance for hand-on explorations, the other formative assessments only include sample answers and scoring guidelines.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 4, Lesson 3: Prepare for Weather, the three-dimensional lesson objective is “Children will consider ways they can prepare for the effects of different kinds of weather, especially severe weather like tornadoes,” and is connected to performance expectation K-ESS3-2. Formative assessment is embedded in the Making Sense, Can You Explain It?, Apply What you Know, and Self Check portions of the learning sequence. The Making Sense and Can You Explain It? questions ask students about how people might prepare for weather and how forecasts can help them do that (DCI-ESS3.B-P1). The Lesson Check includes questions asking students to interpret weather reports (SEP-INFO-P1) and when and how to prepare for weather (DCI-ESS3.B-P1). There is a missed opportunity to assess CCC-CE-P2. While the materials provide remediation guidance for hand-on explorations, the other formative assessments only include sample answers and scoring guidelines.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 5, Lesson 2: Change the Way Things Move, the three-dimensional learning objective is “Children will analyze data to determine if a designed solution works as planned to change an object’s speed or direction with a push or a pull,” and is associated with performance expectations K-PS2-1, K-PS2-2, K-2-ETS-1, and K-2-ETS1-2. In the Making Sense and Can You Explain It? assessments, students use observations to explain the effect of kicking a ball (DCI-PS2.A-P2, DCI-PS2.B-P1, and CCC-CE-P1). In Apply What You Know assessments, students investigate the effect of kicking a ball with stronger and weaker forces (DCI-PS3.C-P1, SEP-INV-P1) and list how to change an object’s direction (DCI-PS2.A-P2). There is a missed opportunity to assess SEP-DATA-P5. While the materials provide remediation guidance for hand-on explorations, the other formative assessments only include sample answers and scoring guidelines.

Indicator 1c

4 / 4

Materials are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence of three-dimensional learning.

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that they are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence of the three-dimensional learning in the instructional materials.

In Kindergarten, most units provide three-dimensional objectives as they are built around multiple performance expectations (PEs). The exception is Unit 1. This unit is built around a PE that incorporates an engineering, technology, and applications of science DCI, but does not incorporate a life, physical, or earth and space science DCI. When three-dimensional objectives are present, summative assessments measure student achievement of nearly all of the elements of the learning objectives.

The summative assessment system consists of a unit test for each unit, a mid-year assessment, an end-of-year assessment, and four performance-based assessments. The unit tests are five questions that are typically multiple choice or matching. These questions typically address the DCI elements of the unit’s performance expectations. The mid-year and end-of-year tests are composed of mostly multiple choice, matching, and fill-in-the-blank questions. These assessments also typically assess DCIs, but also address some of the SEPs. The four performance-based assessments are connected to performance expectations rather than a particular unit. These assessments typically engage students in a brief investigation or hands-on activity followed by a small set of multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, or matching questions. Although the unit tests do not usually assess all elements from a unit, across the entire assessment system nearly all elements of the learning goals are assessed.

 

Examples of three-dimensional objectives and unit tests that partially assess the objectives:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 2: Plants and Animals, the objectives are two performance expectations: K-LS1-1 and K-ESS3-1. The five questions found on the Unit Test address core content knowledge as students answer questions about what animals need to live and grow and identify what habitat a given animal lives in (DCI-LS1.C-P1, DCI-ESS3.A-P1). 

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3: Resources in the Environment, the objectives are three performance expectations: K-ESS2-2, K-ESS3-3, and K-ESS3-1. The Unit Test consists of multiple choice questions that are read to the students by the teacher. Students identify how plants/animals can change their environment (DCI-ESS2.E-P1) or how people can use natural resources (DCI-ESS3.C-P1). 

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 4: Weather, the objectives are six performance expectations: K-PS3-1, K-PS3-2, K-2-ETS1-1, K-2-ETS1-2, K-ESS2-1, and K-ESS3-2. The Unit Test is composed of five multiple choice questions that are read orally to the student. Students answer questions about preparing for weather conditions, using weather forecasts and reports, and severe weather (DCI-ESS3.B-P1, DCI-ESS2.D-P1).

Examples of performance-based assessments that assess additional elements of the learning objectives: 

  • In Kindergarten, No Place Like Home performance-based assessment, students create a model of a habitat and what plants and animals live there (DCI-ESS3.C-P1, SEP-MOD-P3). Students then build a home for their plants and animals, describe how they interact with their environment, name changes the organisms make, and identify the plants’ and animals’ needs (DCI-ESS3.A-P1, DCI-ESS2.E-P1, DCI-LS1.C-P1, CCC-PAT-P1, and CCC-SYS-P2)

  • In Kindergarten, A Place in the Sun performance-based assessment, students make observations of the temperature of locations in and out of shade and identify when they were warmer (SEP-INV-P4, CCC-CE-P2). Students then design, test, and modify a device that will keep an item cool in the sun (DCI-PS3.B-P1, SEP-CEDS-P2).

  • In Kindergarten, It’s the Force, Of Course! performance-based assessment, students predict and test the effect of a soft and hard push on full and empty water bottles (DCI-PS2.A-P1, DCI-PS2.A-P2, DCI-PS3.C-P1, SEP-INV-P1, and CCC-CE-P1). Next, students make, test, and modify a ramp that will knock over an increasing number of pins (DCI-PS2.A-P1, DCI-PS2.A-P2, DCI-PS3.C-P1, SEP-DATA-P5, and CCC-CE-P1).

Criterion 1.2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning

4 / 12

Materials leverage science phenomena and engineering problems in the context of driving learning and student performance.

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten do not meet expectations for Criterion 1d-1i: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning. The materials include phenomena and problems at the lesson and sequence level. Of those phenomena and problems, they consistently connect to grade-level appropriate DCIs. Phenomena and problems are inconsistently presented to students as directly as possible. Few instances of phenomena or problems driving learning and use of the three dimensions are present  at the sequence or lesson level, as a science topic or guiding question is the primary focus of the learning. The materials consistently elicit but do not leverage student prior knowledge and experience related to the phenomena and problems present.

Narrative Only

Indicator 1d

2 / 2

Phenomena and/or problems are connected to grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas.

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems are connected to grade-level Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs).

The materials consistently provide phenomena and problems that connect to grade-level DCIs or their elements. Most of the phenomena, problems, and design challenges present connect to a grade-level DCI. The materials provide opportunities for students to build an understanding of grade-level DCIs through the exploration of unit-level phenomena. The one exception is Unit 1, where the problems are connected to DCIs in engineering, technology, and applications of science, but not life, physical, or earth and space science. In some cases, the lesson-level phenomena work together to help students make sense of corresponding DCIs. All science disciplines are represented in the phenomena and problems connected to grade-level DCIs.

Examples of phenomena and problems connected to grade-level DCIs or their elements:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 2, Lesson 1: What Plants Need, the phenomenon is that a plant’s leaves can wilt and lose color. Students observe the photographs or watch the video of the plant leaves wilting and losing color and discuss what they notice about the plants. Students investigate what plants need to live and grow (DCI-LS1.C-P1).

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 1, Exploration 1: Look at a Worm Hole, the phenomenon is that a worm digs in the soil. Students ask a question based on the phenomenon and then observe and collect data of a worm in its environment (DCI-ESS2.E-P1).

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 1, Exploration 2: Look at Plant Changes, the phenomenon is that tree roots can crack a sidewalk. Students explore other examples of plants that have changed their environments and then discuss how the plants have changed their environment (DCI-ESS2.E-P1).

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 4, Lesson 3: Prepare for Weather, the phenomenon is that a tornado moves across the land. Students learn throughout the lesson that weather reports can help determine patterns in weather and help people make preparations for a severe weather event (DCI-ESS3.B-P1). Students use this information to make a claim that people make plans based on the patterns they see in weather.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 4, Lesson 1, Exploration 2: Plan and Build Shade, the challenge is to design a structure that provides shade. Students create a model of, and build, a structure that will provide shade (DCI-ETS1.B-P1). Students use their structures to protect one rock from sunlight and compare that to a second rock not under their shade structure. Students use their findings to make a claim about whether the shade protected the rock from heating from the sun (DCI-PS3.B-P1).

Indicator 1e

1 / 2

Phenomena and/or problems are presented to students as directly as possible.

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems are presented to students as directly as possible.

Kindergarten materials present phenomena and/or problems to students as directly as possible in multiple instances but not consistently across the grade level. In multiple instances, the materials provide students access to the phenomena that leads to a shared common experience and a robust entry point into the phenomena. The materials present the phenomena as a video or image that is accompanied by narration. The lessons that include a video presentation often present the phenomenon or problem as directly as possible to the students. In general, phenomena are not presented to students as directly as possible when a change over time or motion is an element of the phenomenon. No instances are present where students engage with the phenomena first hand. Finally, some of the phenomenon presentations do not provide students with enough information about that event or process to make the phenomenon accessible to all students. 

Examples of phenomena and problems that are presented to students as directly as possible, providing a common experience of the process(es) and a robust entry point:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 1, Lesson 1: Using a Design Process, the problem is that children do not have enough bubble wands. Students view a narrated video of two children. One child is playing with a bubble wand and the narration states that the second child, without a bubble wand, would like to blow bubbles. 

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 1, Exploration 2: Look at Plant Changes, the phenomenon is that tree roots can crack a sidewalk. Students view an illustration of a tree growing next to a sidewalk with roots pushing up through the sidewalk. The narration explains that plant roots can crack a sidewalk. 

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 4, Lesson 3: Prepare for Weather, the phenomenon is that a tornado moves across land. Students view a video of a tornado. Students can clearly see the tornado moving.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 5, Lesson 2: Change the Way Things Move, the phenomenon is that a boy kicks a ball. Students observe a photograph and video of a student kicking a soccer ball and the ball traveling in many directions. Students can clearly see the change in motion of the soccer ball caused by the child.

Examples of phenomena and problems that are not presented to students as directly as possible:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 2, Lesson 2, Exploration 2: Make a Pill Bug Home, the phenomenon is that a pill bug crawls in soil. Students observe a picture of a pill bug in its environment. It is not clear to students what environment the pill bugs live in. There is a missed opportunity for the presentation of this phenomenon to provide a common experience and a robust entry point.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 5, Lesson 1, Exploration 1: Push or Pull, the phenomenon is that a child pushes a shopping cart. Students view a picture of a child pushing a grocery cart. The still picture does not make clear the motion of the cart. There is a missed opportunity for the presentation of this phenomenon to provide a common experience of this process and a robust entry point.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 5, Lesson 2, Exploration 1: Roll a Ball, the phenomenon is that a bowling ball collides with pins. Students observe a photograph of a bowling ball in the middle of bowling pins. Students cannot observe the motion of the ball, the collision, or the motion of the pins. There is a missed opportunity for the presentation of this phenomenon to provide a common experience of this process and a robust entry point.

  • In Grade K, Unit 5, Lesson 2, Exploration 2: Design a Track, the design challenge is to design a track that can change the speed and direction of a ball. Students observe a photograph of two students in front of various craft materials. The narration prompts students to ask a question about motion, but does not make the challenge clear. There is a missed opportunity for the presentation of this design challenge to provide a common experience of this process and a robust entry point.

Indicator 1f

0 / 2

Phenomena and/or problems drive individual lessons or activities using key elements of all three dimensions.

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten do not meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems drive individual lessons or activities using key elements of all three dimensions.

The materials provide few explorations or activities within the grade that use phenomena and problems to drive student learning and use elements from the three dimensions. In the majority of the explorations, the phenomenon is used instructionally as a tool to engage students and to pique their interest, but does not ultimately drive student learning. Instead, student acquisition of science content is the focus of student learning in the explorations rather than students working to understand or explain the presented phenomena. The explorations often open with the phenomenon, but the phenomenon is typically not discussed throughout the exploration until the end when students revisit the phenomenon or question. As a result, students are not engaged in figuring out the phenomenon through their work. 

While most explorations are not driven by a phenomenon, many do incorporate all three dimensions. In instances where the exploration or activity does not incorporate all three dimensions, the crosscutting concept is frequently missing. Across all disciplines, the crosscutting concept most often present is patterns. Science and engineering practices are frequently found throughout the explorations or activities. Most commonly, students are engaged with the practices of analyzing and interpreting data, constructing explanations, and designing solutions.

Examples of explorations or activities that do not use a phenomenon or problem to drive student learning:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 2, Lesson 3, Exploration 1: Match Animal Homes, the exploration is not driven by a phenomenon or problem. Instead, the focus of the exploration is the science concept that animals live in different environments. In this activity, students look at pictures of animals in their environments and use that information to match three animals to their homes. Students then make a claim about why that animal lives in the environment.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 1, Exploration 2: Look at Plant Changes, the phenomenon is that tree roots can crack a sidewalk; however the phenomenon does not drive student learning. Instead, the focus of the exploration is the science topic of how plants grow. Students look at pictures in books of plants changing their environment and use them to make a claim about how plants grow based on evidence in the books.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 4, Lesson 2, Exploration 1: Measure Temperature, the exploration is not driven by a phenomenon or problem. Instead, the focus of the exploration is the science concept that people can measure the weather and make predictions based on patterns. Students work with a partner and record the temperature every morning and every afternoon for five days. They make observations about the data they collect and use their evidence to make a claim about patterns that they see. 

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 5, Lesson 1, Exploration 2: Change Motion, there is no phenomenon present that drives learning. Instead, the focus of the exploration is making a plan to change the speed or direction of an object. Students make a plan to make an object move, share their plan with a classmate, and make changes to their plan. Students later make a claim about how they can change the speed and direction of a ball. 

Examples of explorations or activities that use a phenomenon or problem to drive student learning but do not engage students with all three dimensions:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 1, Lesson 1, Exploration 2: Engineer It-Solve a Problem, the design challenge is to construct a bubble wand. In the design challenge, students are presented with various materials and are asked to design a bubble wand. Students plan and construct the bubble wand and have their classmates suggest changes, which are then implemented (SEP-INV-P2). Finally, students describe how they developed their final solution. There is a missed opportunity to incorporate a DCI from life, physical, or earth and space science as well as a CCC.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 1, Exploration 1: Look at a Worm Home, the phenomenon is a worm digging in the soil. Students investigate the phenomenon by exploring the behavior of worms and observing the changes that they make to their environment (DCI-ESS2.E-P1). Students then collect data over a three day period to see how the soil changes (SEP-DATA-P1). Then students make claims based on the evidence they found in their observations of the worms burrowing in the soil (SEP-CEDS-P1). There is a missed opportunity to incorporate a CCC.

Indicator 1g

Narrative Only

Materials are designed to include both phenomena and problems.

The materials for Kindergarten are divided into five units: Unit 1: Engineering Design Process, Unit 2: Plants and Animals, Unit 3: Resources in Environments, Unit 4: Weather, and Unit 5: Pushes and Pulls. Each unit is divided into three or four learning sequences called lessons. Each lesson consists of an engage activity and two to three one-day explorations. Some of the explorations are hands-on activities, while others are reading or informational sections for concept development. There are 34 explorations in the Kindergarten materials.

In the Kindergarten materials, each lesson begins with the publisher-identified anchoring phenomenon presented with an image and video in an engage activity. However, the phenomenon is typically described as a scientific concept or a guiding question. In the engage activity, students ask questions about the lesson-level phenomenon or associated content. Lessons consist of two to three explorations denoted as “Hands On”. Each exploration begins with students asking questions about a publisher-identified Investigative Phenomenon and concludes with students responding to a question related to the Anchoring Phenomenon or associated content. Phenomena are present for all science disciplines.

Examples of problems present in the instructional materials:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 2, Exploration 2: Find Solutions for Trash, the problem is that garbage is on the ground near a lake. Students first observe a photo of land covered in trash next to a lake and ask questions in order to discuss how trash is harmful to the land. The students solve this problem by creating models of solutions that describe how to reduce trash in the environment.

Examples of phenomena presented in the instructional materials:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 2, Lesson 2, Exploration 2: Make a Pill Bug Home, the phenomenon is that a pill bug crawls in soil. Students build a pill bug home, incorporating areas that create both light and shade for the pill bugs. To explain the phenomenon, students identify patterns in the pill bugs' behavior to determine in what environment pill bugs prefer to live.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 1, Exploration 1: Look at a Worm Hole, the phenomenon is that a worm digs in the soil. Students observe a photo of worms digging holes in soil. They then observe a real worm hole over the course of three days and record their observations. To explain the phenomenon, students make claims based on evidence about why worms change their environment.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 1, Exploration 2: Look at Plant Changes, the phenomenon is that tree roots have cracked a sidewalk. Students observe two photos, one of a tree next to an intact sidewalk and another with a tree next to a sidewalk that has been cracked by growing tree roots. After looking at the pictures, they ask questions about how the plant roots are growing. To explain the phenomenon, students make a claim about why plants change their environment based on the evidence collected through observing the photos.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 5, Lesson 2, Exploration 1: Roll a Ball, the phenomenon is that a bowling ball knocks over bowling pins. Students observe a picture of a bowling ball knocking over bowling pins and ask questions about what happens when objects bump into each other. They roll two balls so they bump into each other and record their observations. To explain the phenomenon, students make a claim using evidence about what happens when balls bump into each other.

Indicator 1h

1 / 2

Materials intentionally leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to phenomena or problems.

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten partially meet expectations that they intentionally leverage students’ prior knowledge and experience related to phenomena or problems.

The Kindergarten materials consistently provide opportunities for teachers to elicit students’ prior knowledge and experience of phenomena and problems. Phenomena and problems are present at both the learning sequence level, called Lessons, and the learning opportunity level, called Explorations. Phenomena and problems introduced at the lesson level include a question called a TELL Prompt in the Culturally Responsive Education portion of the teacher notes. The TELL Prompt typically asks students for their prior knowledge or experience related to the phenomenon or problem and provides possible student responses for the teacher. When phenomena are present in Explorations, the teacher notes sometimes include an Everyday Phenomenon. This provides an alternate phenomenon for teachers to describe to students, along with questions for students to make connections to the alternate phenomenon. In some cases these prompts are clearly connected to the phenomenon for the Exploration and in others they only connect to the alternate phenomenon.

While the materials consistently elicit students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to phenomena and problems, they miss the opportunity to leverage those ideas and experiences in student learning. The Culturally Responsive Education portion of the teacher notes in each Lesson includes generic guidance for the teacher to “use what you learn from children’s responses to help them connect new academic concepts,” but student responses to the TELL prompt are not recorded, returned to later in the sequence, or explicitly incorporated into the sequence.

Examples where the materials elicit but do not leverage students’ prior knowledge and experience related to phenomena and problems:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 2, Lesson 2: What Plants Need, the phenomenon is that a plant’s leaves have wilted and lost color. The TELL Prompt asks students to describe what they know about why a plant may lose its color. There is a missed opportunity to leverage student responses later in the lesson.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 1, Exploration 2: Look at Plant Changes, the phenomenon is that tree roots can crack a sidewalk. In the guidance for the Everyday Phenomenon, the teacher puts students into groups to discuss their prior experience seeing how roots change an environment. There is a missed opportunity to leverage student responses later in the exploration.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 4, Lesson 1: Protection from the Sun, the phenomenon is that it is cooler in a tent than it is in the sun. The TELL Prompt asks students to describe what they know about the difference in temperature between places in direct sunlight and places in the shade. There is a missed opportunity to leverage student responses later in the lesson.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 4, Lesson 2: Weather Patterns, the phenomenon is that clouds can change from day to day. The TELL Prompt asks students to describe what they know about different types of clouds and what they mean. There is a missed opportunity to leverage student responses later in the lesson.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 5, Lesson 2, Exploration 1: Roll a Ball, the phenomenon is a bowling ball knocking over bowling pins. In the guidance for the Everyday Phenomenon, the teacher puts students into groups to discuss their experience with toys knocking into one another. There is a missed opportunity to leverage student responses later in the exploration.

Indicator 1i

0 / 4

Materials embed phenomena or problems across multiple lessons for students to use and build knowledge of all three dimensions.

The instructional materials reviewed for Kindergarten do not meet expectations that they embed phenomena or problems across multiple lessons for students to use and build knowledge of all three dimensions.

Materials provide few lessons across the grade that use phenomena or problems to drive instruction and engage with all three dimensions across multiple explorations. Typically lessons contain a publisher identified anchoring phenomenon to initially engage students but then use a DCI or other science topic as the focus of student learning across the lesson sequence. 

Kindergarten units are typically two to three lessons long, with each lesson made up of an engage activity and four to seven explorations. The engage activity introduces the sequence with an image and/or video. Sometimes this video or image is a phenomenon or problem and other times it illustrates the question or DCI guiding the sequence. Students ask questions about the phenomenon, problem, or DCI and answer the Can you explain it? question that asks a question related to the introductory image and/or video. Sometimes, students make an initial claim explaining the image and/or video. In the explorations, students are presented with another image and/or text introducing a new phenomenon, problem, or DCI. After engaging with the exploration-level phenomenon, problem, or DCI, students answer a question related to the initial lesson-level problem, phenomenon, or DCI. At the end of the lesson sequence, students revisit the engage activity and are given an opportunity to revise their answer to the lesson-level question. While the materials ask students questions about the phenomena at the closing of each lesson, students rarely collect evidence to directly explain the phenomenon that is presented. As a result, students are not engaged in figuring out the phenomenon. 

Examples of lesson sequences where student learning is driven by a phenomenon across multiple lessons but the materials do not engage students with all three dimensions:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 1, Lesson 1: Using a Design Process, the problem is that children don't have enough bubble wands. Students engage in a design challenge to plan, build, and test bubble wands. Students identify the problem and provide an explanation for how they can solve the problem (DCI-ETS1.A-P3). Students first ask a question about how to make a good bubble wand (DCI-ETS1.A-P2, SEP-AQDP-P1), then they explore the problem further and make a plan to solve it (DCI-ETS1.A-P1, DCI-ETS1.B-P1, and SEP-AQDP-P3). The students build and test their solutions, share their solutions with other students, and work to improve their solutions (DCI-ETS1.C-P1, SEP-MOD-P4, and SEP-CEDS-P2). Students make an argument, based on their evidence (SEP-ARG-P6) about how the design process helps find a solution to a problem. Students have the opportunity to make revisions to their bubble wands, but they are not provided with multimodal opportunities to develop, evaluate, and revise their thinking related to how to engineer a bubble wand. There is a missed opportunity to engage students with CCCs and DCIs from life, physical, or earth and space science while students are engaged in solving this problem.

Examples of lesson sequences where student learning is not driven by a phenomenon across multiple lessons:

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 2, Lesson 3: Where Plants and Animals Live, there is no phenomenon or problem in this lesson. Instead, student learning in this sequence is guided by the science concept that animals and plants live in different habitats. Students identify where certain animals live and draw the animal in their home. Students perform a controlled experiment in which they observe how the amount of water impacts a plant’s health.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 1: Plants and Animals Make Changes, the phenomenon is that a squirrel is eating nuts in an empty field that is now a forest. The phenomenon does not drive student learning across multiple explorations. Instead, the question “Why do living things change their environment?” is the focus of student learning. Students observe how worms change their environment and make a claim about why they do so, observe pictures of plants changing their environment and make a claim about why they do so, and plan a playground structure and make a claim about why people change their environment. Students develop their thinking by answering the question “Why do living things change their environment?”.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 3, Lesson 2: Natural Resources, there is no phenomenon or problem in the sequence. Instead, student learning is guided by the concepts that people use natural resources and that reducing and reusing lessens human’s impact on the environment. First, students identify how people use different resources. Students then develop ideas on how to reduce the amount of trash in a landfill. In the next three activities, students learn how natural resources are harmed, how resource use can be reduced, and how resources are reused and recycled.

  • In Kindergarten, Unit 4, Lesson 3: Prepare for Weather, the phenomenon is that a tornado moves across land. The phenomenon does not drive student learning across multiple explorations. Rather the idea that a weather report can help prepare people for safety is the focus of student learning. Students track weather over 5 days by noting the weather report and the actual weather. Students explore severe weather and draw a plan for how they would prepare for severe weather. 

  • In Grade K, Unit 5, Lesson 1: All About Motion, the phenomena are that a child being pulled on a wagon and a child being pushed on a swing are moving. The phenomena only drive student learning across a single exploration in the sequence. In Exploration 2, students make a plan for how they will move a ball by blowing it with a piece of cardboard, they share their plans with a partner and then revise their plans. Students use this evidence to support a claim about the effect of different strengths of forces, which is related to, but outside the scope of the lesson-level phenomena.